| June 2003
American Friends Service Committee Peacework Magazine Patrica Watson, Editor Sara Burke, Assistant Editor Pat Farren, Founding Editor 2161 Massachusetts Ave. Telephone number: Fax number:
pwork@igc.org Peacework has been published monthly since 1972, intended to serve as a source of dependable information to those who strive for peace and justice and are committed to furthering the nonviolent social change necessary to achieve them. Rooted in Quaker values and informed by AFSC experience and initiatives, Peacework offers a forum for organizers, fostering coalition-building and teaching the methods and strategies that work in the global and local community. Peacework seeks to serve as an incubator for social transformation, introducing a younger generation to a deeper analysis of problems and issues, reminding and re-inspiring long-term activists, encouraging the generations to listen to each other, and creating space for the voices of the disenfranchised. Views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of the AFSC. |
It Doesn't Add Up Marty Jezer is author of Abbie Hoffman: American Rebel (Rutgers University Press) and The Dark Ages: Life in the USA, 1945-1960 (South End Press) among others. He writes for the Brattleboro (VT) Reformer and welcomes comments at <mjez@sover.net > The same week that the Vermont legislature voted to raise the state's minimum wage from $6.25 to $6.75 an hour, it was reported that Central Vermont Public Services' CEO, Robert H. Young, had his compensation package increased from $303,000 to $938,184. My rough math indicates that minimum wage workers can expect an eight percent wage-hike, but will still be living in poverty even if they hold full-time jobs. Mr. Young, on the other hand, will enjoy a rise in income of more than 300 percent. Based on a 40-hour week, his pay will go from about $150 to $450 an hour. CVPS spokesman, Stephen Costello, correctly noted that ratepayers are only paying part of Young's compensation, and that "outside consultants" recommended the generous package. Young's salary is competitive to what CEOs of similar-sized companies get. "We have to compete for talent across New England and across the country," Costello said. But CEO salaries exist outside of the competitive free-market; it's a closed market of crony capitalism at its most blatant. CEOs sit on each other's company boards and reward each other with huge salaries, bonuses, incentives, and stock options. Those "outside consultants" don't reflect the interests of company employees or consumers of company products; nor do they represent small shareholders. More and more, our economy is becoming a two-tier, closed-circle system. When it comes to economic decision-making, most Americans are shut out. Hard times seem to have no effect on executive salaries. American Airlines, losing $1.5 million a day and on the verge of bankruptcy, negotiated a $1.8 billion, 23 percent cut in wages and benefits from its unionized employees. Seven thousand face layoffs. At the same time, CEO Donald J. Carty rewarded himself with a $1.6 million bonus, doubled the pay of six top executives, and set up a protected $41 million pension fund for the company's 45 top managers. Airline unions forced Carty's resignation. Strong unions are a potential counter to crony capitalism, but in the current political climate they have very little power. The demand for tax cuts dominates the economic discussion. Bush wants $550 billion in cuts over the next ten years, most of which will go to people like Young and Carty, the wealthiest one percent of the population. Some Republicans want to reduce the cuts to $350 billion, which is still more than the economy can afford. Those moderates have been attacked by right-wingers who, in TV ads, compared them to the hated and un-American French. "Nothing is more important in the face of war than cutting taxes," said Tom DeLay, the Republican House majority leader. Really? Meanwhile, states face their biggest deficits since the second world war--a $100 billion shortfall by some estimates. Bush takes credit for cutting federal taxes, but he's forcing local and state governments to slash services and raise taxes.
An article in the New York Times
When pressed to comment on these cutbacks, Bush was unmoved. "It's because we went though a recession and we're at war," he told the National Governors' Association.
The war and reconstruction of Iraq is budgeted at $74.7 billion, though most experts believe it will cost more. Included in that budget is money for "universal health service delivery to the Iraqi population." I don't begrudge the Iraqis their medical expenses at our cost, but what about those millions of Americans who have no health insurance? And what kind of health plan will Bush be offering Iraq? The American-system of HMOs, bureaucratic paperwork, and high premiums, co-payments, and deductibles? If so, the Iraqis will have yet another reason for wanting us out of their country. Meanwhile in our country, millions of senior citizens, children, and low-income Americans are losing their health care benefits as bankrupt states slash Medicare and Medicare coverage. It doesn't add up. Astronomical pay for top management but fierce resistance to an equitable livable wage for the millions of Americans in minimum wage jobs. Tax cuts for the rich but increased scrutiny by the IRS of the working poor who take the earned income credit. Much talk about terrorism and national security but not enough money to protect our vulnerable shipping ports, airports, or nuclear and industrial plants. More money for war, but less money for schools, health care, social services, and economic infrastructure--the necessities of future prosperity.
Ideology rules. The Republican right-wingers
who dominate the Bush administration want to destroy government
social programs and turn government services over to their cronies
in the corporate sector. But the free market can't, without
government support, build low-cost housing, provide universal
access to health care, protect small businesses, downtown centers,
family farms, and the environment against the scourge of corporate
globalization, fund public education; nor can it show compassion
for the poor and disabled. It just ain't profitable. By cutting
taxes, increasing military spending, and running huge deficits,
Bush and his allies are deliberately starving the public sector.
Future generations will pay for their greed, their blunders, and
the "political correctness" of their ideological
blinders. |
|
|