Peacework
October 2002



About Peacework

Subscribe Now

Current Contents

October Contents

Back Issues

Index
2001   2000   1999

National AFSC

NERO Office



American Friends Service Committee

Peacework Magazine

Patrica Watson, Editor

Sara Burke, Assistant Editor

Pat Farren, Founding Editor

2161 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02140

Telephone number:
(617) 661-6130

Fax number:
(617) 354-2832

Email address:
pwork@igc.org



Peacework has been published monthly since 1972, intended to serve as a source of dependable information to those who strive for peace and justice and are committed to furthering the nonviolent social change necessary to achieve them. Rooted in Quaker values and informed by AFSC experience and initiatives, Peacework offers a forum for organizers, fostering coalition-building and teaching the methods and strategies that work in the global and local community. Peacework seeks to serve as an incubator for social transformation, introducing a younger generation to a deeper analysis of problems and issues, reminding and re-inspiring long-term activists, encouraging the generations to listen to each other, and creating space for the voices of the disenfranchised.

Views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of the AFSC.

Getting to Know the Free Trade Area of the Americas

Text of a pamphlet prepared for use in New Hampshire by Arnie Alpert, NH Fair Trade, c/o AFSC, 4 Park St., Suite 209, Concord, NH 03301; aalpert@afsc.org or (603) 224-2407. They encourage people to adapt it for use in their own communities.

What if someone told you there was an international agreement which could:

  • Let a private company take over your city's water system and triple water bills?
  • Make the minimum wage illegal, so there's no floor under wages?
  • Wipe out laws protecting public health and the environment?
  • Make it easier for NH corporations to move to countries where workers cannot organize for fair wages, healthy work environments, and independent unions?

Would you want that agreement to pass?

Such an agreement has been under negotiation since 1998.

It's called the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).

There's still time to stop the FTAA.

We need your help!

Negotiations on the FTAA are scheduled to be completed in 2004. A ratification vote is expected in the US Congress in 2004 or 2005.

Ask the candidates about the FTAA (sample questions)

  • Will you oppose the FTAA if it includes investor protections similar to those in NAFTA which allow foreign corporations to sue governments that pass labor, public health, and environmental protection laws that reduce corporate profits?
  • Given the ongoing loss of manufacturing jobs to countries with low labor and human rights standards, will you oppose the Free Trade Area of the Americas if it prohibits retaliation against trading partners who use labor violations to gain an unfair trade advantage?
  • Will you oppose the FTAA if it allows foreign companies to evade human rights and prevailing wage laws established by local, state, or federal governments?
  • Will you oppose the FTAA if it contains provisions that force local and state governments to accept bids from foreign companies to provide services--such as water distribution, education and mail delivery--that have previously been provided by the government?

How did they respond? Please send your report to:

Arnie Alpert, NH Fair Trade, c/o AFSC, 4 Park St., Suite 209, Concord, NH 03301
aalpert@afsc.org or (603) 224-2407

Additional information on-line:

People's Consultation, www.peoplesconsultation.org
Alliance for Responsible Trade, www.art-us.org
Global Tradewatch, www.tradewatch.org
US Trade Representative, www.ustr.gov
Official FTAA site, www.ftaa-alca.org
American Friends Service Committee-NH, www.afsc.org/nero/nenh.htm

What is the Free Trade Area of the Americas?

The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) is a proposed trade agreement which would strengthen and extend the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to the entire Western Hemisphere, except Cuba.

The FTAA would further reduce the power of local, state, and national governments to determine their own health, environmental, and labor policies, and would go even further than NAFTA in extending rights and protections to international investors and trans-national corporations. It includes no enforceable rules to protect the environment or the human rights of workers.

The FTAA is being negotiated behind closed doors. It will come before Congress for ratification in 2004 or 2005. Under "Fast Track" authority Congress cannot amend the FTAA.

Trading Away Public Services

The FTAA would give corporations a right to bid on buying or operating all public services, including schools, libraries, and even the public water supply force governments to give contracts to the lowest bidder without considering fair labor practices, corporate safety records, or environmental responsibility.

Trading Away Democracy

The FTAA would expand the rights of foreign investors to directly sue a government over laws that threaten their profits, including laws protecting workers, the environment, public health, and consumer safety. The case would be heard by a closed tribunal, not in open court. In similar cases under NAFTA, tribunals have already awarded corporations millions of taxpayer dollars in compensation.

Trading Away Jobs

Even before NAFTA and the WTO, manufacturing companies were leaving New Hampshire for countries with weak or non-existent unions, low labor standards, and poor environmental protection. While NAFTA and the WTO protect corporate trademarks and the rights of investors, they give no protection to the human rights of workers to form unions.

In the summer of 2002, the foreign owners of Milford's Permattach Diamond Tool Corp. announced the plant's closure and the layoff of 45 people, citing "competitors using cheaper materials, labor and overhead from countries such as Mexico, China and India." L.W. Packard, a woolen mill in Ashland, closed shop, laid off 50 people, and shipped its state-of-the-art equipment to its new factory in China.

FTAA would accelerate the loss of New Hampshire jobs by making it easier for companies to move their work to sweatshops.

Trading Away Worker Protections and Human Rights

Prevailing wage laws in more than thirty states require contractors working on public construction projects to pay their employees at least the wages and benefits that "prevail" in their local communities for similar work. More than 77 cities and counties have passed "living wage" ordinances that set a threshold for wages and benefits higher than the legal minimum. State laws and local ordinances penalized corporations doing business in South Africa during the years of apartheid.

Under FTAA, such laws would be subject to challenge by foreign companies if they are "more burdensome than necessary" to business. Qualifications other than on price and quality would be considered unfair barriers to trade.

What you can do:

Contact your Senators and Representatives and tell them to vote NO on the FTAA.

Tell Presidential candidates what you think about the FTAA and find out their opinions.

Contact us to arrange a presentation on the FTAA for your organization or class.

Join the international grassroots campaign to defeat the FTAA (www.peoplesconsultation.org).

Previous Article    Next Article


About   |   Subscribe   |   Current Contents   |   October Contents   |   Back Issues

Peacework Magazine on the web:   http://www.peaceworkmagazine.org